He was very angry at me and even dropped his pants to show me where the ball hit him. In Cavin v. Kasser, the plaintiff was waiting to tee off on the number two hole of Creve Coeur Golf Club. Also does the City of Irvine have any liability for allowing a safety hazard like that to exist for years? Two weeks ago a particularly bad golfer sent a golf ball right through my window, causing considerable damage. They do this by requiring the lessor of a motor vehicle to provide primary insurance coverage in the event of an accident. "https://twitter.com/Rossetti_DeVoto", An errant golf shot is not negligence! I saw the window and it was one that would have cost a substantial amount to replace, but fortunately it wasnt broken. In the state of texas who is responsible for a golf ball that - Avvo The other members of the foursome generally would not have joint and several liability to you for breaking your window. Then, it ricocheted up and hit Larry Bartlett in the eye causing serious injury. Often these days, those policies get VERY expensive unless special glass is put in the windows facing the course. Or, the sponsor of the golf tournament, since the owner or sponsor has a duty to provide minimal protection to spectators at a golf tournament. This was after finding material facts in dispute about the possible negligence in the design and construction of the course. Courts have also held golf course owners liable to motorists hit by stray golf balls while driving on the private entrance road cutting across a golf fairway. This is especially true where the defendant golfer knows of his propensity to shank his golf shot. It would have been interesting to see how the police would have sorted it out since he was exposing himself in a public and there were women in my group. In these cases, neither the defendants lack of negligence nor the plaintiffs contributory negligence is ordinarily relevant. Where an injured golfer brings suit against the negligent golfer and the corporation, settlement and release of the golfer in return for a covenant not to sue does not release the corporation and its insured from the balance of the injured golfers settlement demand and potential jury award. Multiple large (unmissable) signs on these holes state something like this: WARNING: According to Georgia law (Section 119.C, clause 8), golf course owners and\or operators cannot be held liable for any damages resulting from errant golf balls striking private property. There was a story a while back about a guy who hit a ball into a bunker, unaware that there was someone in the bunker. There are a variety of circumstances that contribute to finding fault and each case is different. The law varies from state to state and often on a case by case basis. It is important to determine whether the golf course is privately or publicly owned. In a situation where an errant golf ball struck a person, the general rule is that the golfer hitting the ball is under a duty to exercise ordinary care; for the safety of persons reasonably within the zone of danger of being where the ball can strike them. The plaintiff required an operation. ] However, a greater duty to warn may develop for golfers playing different holes. And, was struck in the eye destroying his sight. My freind's car was struck on the windshield, in front of her face at eye level. In Cornell v. Langland, the Appellate Court of Illinois found a course owner negligent for failing to correct the yardage indicated on the score card.
Stephen Curry Basketball Camp Charlotte, Nc,
What Happened To Claretha On House Of Payne,
Articles E