Board of Regents v. New Left Education Project, Hart v. Community School Board of Brooklyn, Berry v. School Dist. v Tech: Matt Latourelle Ryan Burch Kirsten Corrao Beth Dellea Travis Eden Tate Kamish Margaret Kearney Eric Lotto Joseph Sanchez. 34. Susan Cianci Salvatore (September 1, 2001), U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, Post Office, Courthouse, and Federal Office Building, NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, List of landmark African-American legislation, List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 339, public domain material from this U.S government document, National Historic Landmark Nomination: Bizzell Library, University of Oklahoma, Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Julian P. Kanter Political Commercial Archive, Gaylord College of Journalism and Mass Communication, College of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciences, Weitzenhoffer Family College of Fine Arts. Decided June 5, 1950. Thus he was required to sit apart at a designated desk in an anteroom adjoining the classroom; to sit at a designated desk on the mezzanine floor of the library, but not to use the desks in the regular reading room; and to sit at a designated table and to eat at a different time from the other students in the school cafeteria. WebIn 1892, Homer Plessy who was seven-eighths Caucasian agreed to participate in a test to challenge the Act. In this case, we are faced with the question whether a state may, after admitting a student to graduate instruction in its state university, afford him different treatment from other students solely because of his race. Argued April 3-4, 1950. (2012.201.B0391.0687, Oklahoma Publishing Company Photography Collection, OHS). To remove these conditions, appellant filed a motion to modify the order and judgment of the District Court. Peer interaction is a vital element in obtaining a good education, and McLaurin was being deprived of that right through segregation. Id. 0000001037 00000 n McLaurin filed suit in federal court in Oklahoma City. The following (as per The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition) is the preferred citation for articles:Alfred L. Brophy, McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950), The Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture, https://www.okhistory.org/publications/enc/entry.php?entry=MC034. The decision in this case was made in conjunction with Sweatt v. Painter and later influenced the decision in Brown v. Board of Education.[1]. Footnotes McLaurin argued that due to this treatment, he was being deprived of his rights under the 14 Amendment. Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1, 13 -14 (1948). McLAURIN v. OKLAHOMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS :: 2020 At the time, Oklahoma law prohibited schools from instructing blacks and whites together. Vinson contended that separating McLaurin from other students would hinder his ability to succeed in achieving higher education. Ann. The removal of the state restrictions will not necessarily abate individual and group predilections, prejudices and choices. [2], Oral argument was held between April 3, 1950, and April 4, 1950. Different treatment of students in public institutions of higher learning solely on the basis of race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. Why it matters: The Supreme Court's decision in this case established that the Equal Protection Clause prohibited states from treating students differently on the basis of race. The justices agreed unanimously that since McLaurin was admitted into the University of Oklahoma, denying him access to his peers through segregation was denying him an opportunity to "study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession."
Traefik Https Backend,
Boone County Wv Police Scanner,
Articles M